Property-management reports
Agree on the relevant rent, receipt, payable, deposit, owner or property reports and the period each report covers. Keep the report source and date visible.
Compare property-system activity with your accounting records, investigate differences and create a repeatable monthly review—without assuming a software migration is needed.
Property managers may use one system for rent, tenant activity, payables or owner reporting and another for the management company’s general ledger. Even when each system produces a report, totals can diverge because of timing, account mapping, duplicate entries, unapplied cash or transactions assigned to the wrong property or entity.
A useful reconciliation does more than compare two totals. It identifies which reports were used, explains known differences, lists exceptions that still need evidence and gives the reviewer a clear route to approve corrections. The process should fit your current systems and controls.
The exact reports and accounts depend on your systems, portfolio and agreed scope. Work is performed against available source records; unresolved items are documented rather than guessed away.
Agree on the relevant rent, receipt, payable, deposit, owner or property reports and the period each report covers. Keep the report source and date visible.
Identify the accounts and dimensions that should reflect the platform activity, including property, entity, class or department where used.
Separate explainable timing differences from missing, duplicated, misclassified or unapplied transactions. Record the period, amount, likely cause and evidence still needed.
Prepare an exception list with source references, questions and proposed next steps. Corrections remain subject to the client’s supporting evidence and approval process.
Set a recurring close date, report owner, reviewer, materiality or escalation rules and a clear record of items carried into the next period.
Use reconciled records as the basis for reporting preparation, while clearly flagging unresolved items that could affect a statement or management decision.
Confirm the period, report date, properties, entities, accounts and export or access method for each system.
Tie the relevant balances and transaction populations together, then separate timing items from exceptions that require investigation.
Maintain source references, amounts, periods, potential causes and outstanding questions so the reviewer can see what is known and what remains unresolved.
The client’s authorized reviewer decides on accounting treatment and approves corrections. Track open items into the next close until they are resolved.
Accounstone provides outsourced accounting preparation and reconciliation within an agreed scope. Your business retains banking control, payment release, owner-distribution approval and decisions about accounting treatment. This work does not replace legal advice, a CPA’s tax or assurance work, software-vendor support or the responsible property manager’s compliance review.
It compares agreed reports from your property-management system with the relevant general-ledger accounts and supporting schedules. The exact comparison depends on your platform, chart of accounts, property/entity structure and reporting process.
We can review your current platform, accounting file, available exports and access permissions to determine a suitable reconciliation workflow. We do not assume that a direct integration exists or that you need to change software.
Differences are listed by type and period, with the reports and evidence reviewed. Possible causes may include timing, duplicate or missing postings, unapplied receipts, coding differences or account mapping. Proposed corrections are documented for your authorized reviewer rather than silently forcing totals to match.
Not necessarily. Cleanup and catch-up work is designed to address a historical backlog. Platform-to-general-ledger reconciliation can instead be scoped as a recurring monthly control, with cleanup of old exceptions added only when agreed.
No. Your business retains banking control, payment release, owner-distribution approval and decisions about accounting treatment. We prepare agreed accounting records and reconciliation schedules for review.
Depending on the system, inputs may include platform ledgers, bank statements, deposit and disbursement reports, payable detail and the general ledger.
Items are matched by amount, date, reference and available source detail; timing items and unexplained differences are listed separately for review.
Yes. The scope can define properties, entities, accounts and periods, with the result summarized consistently across the agreed portfolio.
The package can include source reports, ledger tie-outs, unmatched items, explanations available from the records and questions requiring client input.
Yes. A recurring reconciliation can be scheduled as part of the month-end process once the report sources, cutoffs and reviewer are agreed.
Tell us which property-management system and accounting ledger you use, what does not tie out, and how often you need the reconciliation completed. We can define the source reports, exception log and review handoff.
Set up a practical reconciliation workflow around your current property records, general ledger and review controls.